Frontal P300 asymmetry and congruence judgment: Retroactive switching is impaired during school day mornings in female adolescents.

Investigating frontal EEG asymmetry as a possible biomarker of cognitive control abilities is especially important in ecological contexts such as school and work. We used a novel approach combining judgment performance and hemispheric frontal event-related potential (ERP) P300 asymmetry (fP3As) to evaluate aspects of cognitive control (i.e., repetition and switching) in adolescent females over a two-week ordinary school period. While undergoing electroencephalographic recording, students performed a word-colour "Stroop-like" congruence judgment task during morning and afternoon sessions, on Mondays and Wednesdays. Proportion of incongruence and congruence trials was 75% and 25%, respectively. ERP analysis revealed larger "novelty" right hemispheric fP3As amplitude for infrequent congruence but equivalent or significantly smaller than left hemispheric fP3As amplitude for frequent incongruence. RTs increased with extent of right fP3As shift. Behaviorally, repeat trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by congruent, incongruent followed by incongruent) generally did not differ by time or day and were associated with near-ceiling accuracy. In contrast, switch trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by incongruent, incongruent followed by congruent) in the afternoon were slower and associated with lower accuracy at the expected 75% criterion rate (i.e., judging incongruence by default), dropping significantly below 75% in the mornings. Crucially, compared to afternoon, morning fP3As patterns did not change adaptively with switch trial pairs. Although retroactive switching during congruence judgment was affected at all testing times, we conclude it was most impaired in the mornings of both early and mid school weeks, supporting misalignment between adolescent circadian cycle and school start time. We discuss some implications for optimal learning of adolescents at school.

Long-term impact of neuroscience outreach interventions on elementary students' knowledge.

Neuroeducation is characterized as a subarea of neuroscience that involves comprehending the teaching and learning processes and relating them to neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuropsychology. The inclusion of some aspects of the neuroscience of learning in teachers' and students' formation, applying them in teaching-learning environments, contributes to the quality of education and impacts students' quality of life and health. Thus, the POPNEURO outreach program performs interventions with students and teachers of low-income schools to disseminate neuroscience concepts, relating them to the students' daily lives. This study reports the impact of these actions, assessed 1 yr after their conclusion. The results showed that the long-term impact of the activities carried out is, in general, positive. Even 1 yr after the activities end, students demonstrate knowledge about the neuroscience themes and satisfaction with participating.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article reports on neuroscience disclosure activities performed with school students and describes their short- and long-term positive impact. Even 1 yr after the activities, students demonstrate knowledge about the themes worked on and satisfaction with the activities.

Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.

Introduction: Understanding brain functioning and intellectual giftedness can be challenging and give rise to various misconceptions. Nonetheless, there seems to be a widespread fascination and appetite for these subjects among the lay public and diverse professionals. The present study is the first to investigate general knowledge about the brain, neuromyths and knowledge about giftedness in a highly multilingual and educated country. Methods: Starting from and extending two seminal studies on neuromyths, several novel statements on intellectual giftedness have been included in order to explore knowledge and misconceptions concerning giftedness. Our sample (N = 200) was composed of Luxembourgish education professionals, including students in educational science and cognitive psychology, thus allowing to analyze responses in general and according to training and professional profiles. Specifically, Group 1 consisted of teachers and futures teachers (n = 152). Group 2 consisted of other education professionals and psychology students (n = 48). Results: Despite the size and the unbalanced distribution of the sample, our findings indicate a good level of general knowledge about the brain and learning (71.3% of correct responses in average) which does, however, not preclude the presence of the typically observed original neuromyths. Thus, we replicate the classical finding that misconceptions on Learning Styles (70% of error rate) and the Multiple Intelligence Theory (71.5% of error rate) are the most represented, both in (future and in-service) teachers and other education professionals. Moreover, the present sample also revealed a high presence of misconceptions on intellectual giftedness. Discussion: Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Neuroeducation and Genetics.

Nowadays, more and more educators are turning to neuroscience to be able to discover how children's brains and cognitive development are shaped by their learning experiences. This article discusses the link between neuroeducation and genetics. Several learning disabilities arise from specific genetic characteristics. The contribution of neuroscience is remarkable as it helps to understand the working mechanisms and organization of the brain, from the nerve cell to the integrated nervous system, to bridge the organic bases of behavior with their potential applications. In addition, research in the field of neuroeducation combined with the contribution of information and communication technology (ICT) to the teaching and learning process makes learning more accessible and easier for students.

Neuroeducation and Mathematics: The Formation of New Educational Practices.

Recent research in educational neuroscience has established the correlation between the way the human brain works and the process of perceiving and learning mathematical concepts. In this chapter, a research approach is proposed, based on the principles of educational neuroscience, and focuses on the way students deal with new knowledge in mathematics. Initially, using neuroscientific techniques and a multidimensional approach to new knowledge, data will be collected from students. By collecting neurophysiological measurements and analyzing the data, an attempt will be made to formulate learning paths for a better understanding of fractional concepts, based on the needs of each student.

A Three-Fold Integrated Perspective on Healthy Development: An Opinion Paper.

Mental health and wellbeing are increasingly threatened in the current post-pandemic times, with stress, especially in students, reaching preoccupying levels. In addition, while many educational programs are unidimensional (i.e., lacking integration between physical, emotional and cognitive elements), there are ways to promote physical, social and mental health in children and adolescents. In this opinion paper, we will discuss the importance of an integrative approach for health development and examine relevant factors, such as awareness and emotional intelligence. We will highlight evidence ranging from behavioral to electrophysiological, structural and molecular, and report several recent studies supporting the effectiveness of a holistic approach in supporting wellbeing and creativity in children and adults, and detailing a specific paradigm named the Quadrato Motor Training (QMT). QMT is a specifically structured movement meditation, involving cognitive, motor and affective components. Finally, we will support a holistic view on education, integrating motion, emotion and cognition to develop a person-centered, or in this case student-centered, approach to wellbeing and health.

Pathologists aren't pigeons: exploring the neural basis of visual recognition and perceptual expertise in pathology.

Visual (perceptual) reasoning is a critical skill in many medical specialties, including pathology, diagnostic imaging, and dermatology. However, in an ever-compressed medical curriculum, learning and practicing this skill can be challenging. Previous studies (including work with pigeons) have suggested that using reward-feedback-based activities, novices can gain expert levels of visual diagnostic accuracy in shortened training times. But is this level of diagnostic accuracy a result of image recognition (categorization) or is it the acquisition of diagnostic expertise? To answer this, the authors measured electroencephalographic data (EEG) and two components of the human event-related brain potential (reward positivity and N170) to explore the nature of visual expertise in a novice-expert study in pathology visual diagnosis. It was found that the amplitude of the reward positivity decreased with learning in novices (suggesting a decrease in reliance on feedback, as in other studies). However, this signal remained significantly different from the experts whose reward positivity signal did not change over the course of the experiment. There were no changes in the amplitude of the N170 (a reported neural marker of visual expertise) in novices over time. Novice N170 signals remained statistically and significantly lower in amplitude compared to experts throughout task performance. These data suggest that, while novices gained the ability to recognize (categorize) pathologies through reinforcement learning as quantified by the change in reward positivity, increased accuracy, and decreased time for responses, there was little change in the neural marker associated with visual expertise (N170). This is consistent with the multi-dimensional and complex nature of visual expertise and provides insight into future training programs for novices to bridge the expertise gap.

Brain-anatomy image data set for problem solving associated with reversal error: Volumetric data.

Reversal Error (RE) is a common error in algebra problem solving. This error occurs when students recognize the information in the statement but make mistakes when translating some sentences from natural language to algebraic language, reversing the relationship between two variables in comparison word problems. Structural Magnetic Resonance Image (sMRI) data were collected with the purpose of identifying brain anatomical regions related to the RE phenomenon. The aim of the research was to investigate the brain anatomy differences between participants who failed more than 50% of the answers on the task (N=15) and those who responded correctly 100% of the time (N=18). sMRI analysis revealed differences between the two groups, and details about these data can be found in Ventura-Campos et al. (2022) [1]. This data set contains the sMRI (raw data, pre-processed images), and an excel file with personal information such as age and gender, the scanner with which their sMRI were collected, and the group to which each of the 33 subjects belonged.

Realidad y ficción en neurociencias. Prevalencia de neuromitos entre docentes universitarios de ciencias de la salud / Fact and fiction in neuroscience. Prevalence of neuromyths among university professors of health sciences

Introducción: Desde la década de los noventa, muchos docentes han mostrado un creciente interés por las neurociencias y por la pronta aplicación de los hallazgos neurocientíficos a la educación en al aula, lo cual ha acarreado la proliferación de numerosos neuromitos. Objetivo: Evaluar la prevalencia de neuromitos y el conocimiento sobre el funcionamiento del cerebro entre participantes en un programa de perfeccionamiento en educación en ciencias de la salud, todos ellos profesionales de la salud y profesores universitarios. Sujetos y métodos: El 88% de un total de 197 participantes de cuatro cohortes respondió un cuestionario en línea con 21 afirmaciones acerca del funcionamiento del cerebro, entre las cuales había algunos neuromitos. Se realizó un análisis de frecuencias para cada respuesta obtenida en las diferentes cohortes involucradas en el estudio y una comparación en la muestra general utilizando la prueba de chi cuadrado. Resultados: El 76,6% de los participantes respondió correctamente la mayoría de las afirmaciones sobre el conocimiento de la función cerebral y fue capaz de reconocer algunos de los neuromitos planteados. Cuatro aseveraciones (tres neuromitos y una acerca del funcionamiento cerebral) tuvieron un rendimiento por debajo del 50% (29,2%). Éstas fueron respondidas de forma incorrecta por el 56,3%, y alrededor del 15% de los participantes declaró no saber la respuesta correcta; incluso en dos de ellas el desconocimiento superó el 20%. Conclusiones: Un adecuado conocimiento sobre el funcionamiento del cerebro por parte de los profesores puede permitirles reconocer algunos neuromitos que podrían afectar de manera negativa a su práctica pedagógica, influenciando su desempeño y resultados académicos.(AU)

Introduction: Since the 1990s, many teachers have had a growing interest in neuroscience and in the early application of neuroscientific findings to education in the classroom, which has led to the proliferation of numerous neuromyths. Objective: To assess the prevalence of neuromyths and knowledge about the functioning of the brain among participants in an improvement program in Health Sciences Education, all of them health professionals and university professors. Subjects and methods: 88% of a total of 197 participants from four cohorts answered an online questionnaire with 21 sentences about the functioning of the brain, including some neuromyths. A frequency analysis was performed for each response obtained in the different cohorts involved in the study and a comparison in the general sample using the chi-square test. Results: 76.6% of the participants answered most of the statements about knowledge of brain function correctly and were able to recognize some of the neuromyths posed. Four statements (three neuromyths and one about brain function) had a performance below 50% (29.2%). These were answered incorrectly by 56.3%, and around 15% of the participants stated that they did not know the correct answer, even in two of them the ignorance exceeded 20%. Conclusions: An adequate knowledge of the functioning of the brain by teachers can allow them to recognize some neuromyths that could negatively affect their pedagogical practice, influencing their performance and academic results.(AU)

Draw me a brain: The use of drawing as a tool to examine children's developing knowledge about the "black box".

Recent studies in neuroeducation highlight the benefits of teaching children about how the brain works. However, very little is known about children's naive conceptions about the brain. The current study examined these representations, by asking 6-10 year-old children (N = 257) and adults (N = 38) to draw a brain and the inside of a belly as a control drawing. The drawings were scored using a content analysis and a list of graphic indicators was derived. First, all the graphic indicators used in the brain drawings were different from those used in the belly drawings, suggesting that children are able to distinguish these two organs. Second, with age, children depict (i) an increasing number of indicators, (ii) more complex indicators, (iii) indicators that are more anatomically correct, to depict the brain. There is an important evolution between 6 and 8 years-old but also between 10 years-old and adults. These results are discussed in relation to children's metacognitive knowledge and to their implications for neuroeducation.

Physiology faculty and student contributions to schoolteacher training in neuroscience: innovations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Research investigating how the brain develops and learns profoundly impacts education. Understanding the brain mechanisms responsible for learning and memory and the factors that influence them, such as age, environment, emotions, and motivation, can transform educational strategies by contributing to the development of programs that optimize learning. Including neuroscience education in teachers' training requires teaching them a multidisciplinary approach to science, which presents a challenge. Furthermore, the potential educational advances from the incorporation of neuroscience into teachers' training are hindered by significant obstacles such as translating research into the classroom; this includes the spread of neuromyths and the products, practices, and programs based on them. Our group has 9 years of experience in developing courses for training teachers. However, in 2020 the world faced the COVID-19 pandemic, which imposed on society a new way of carrying out its daily activities, including teaching. This study reports the experiences of our group as we developed the ninth edition of the Neuroscience Applied to Education teachers' training in an online format that included synchronous and asynchronous activities. Sixty teachers participated in the course. The synchronous meetings lasted 1.5 h/wk and addressed different themes: neuroscience and education, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurobiology of learning and memory, factors that interfere with learning, and pedagogical innovation. According to the teachers' perceptions, the course was fundamental for them in terms of acquiring new knowledge about neuroscience. Everyone agreed on the possible applicability of the concepts covered to improve their pedagogical practice and teaching environment.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study reports the experience of developing the ninth edition of the Neuroscience Applied to Education course in an online format that included synchronous and asynchronous activities. Here we show that schoolteachers consider the course important for acquiring new knowledge about neuroscience and the applicability of the concepts covered to improve their pedagogical practice and teaching environment. The online format did not prejudice the experience, and the technologies used were well evaluated.

Sleep quality in medical students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic / Calidad del sueño en estudiantes de medicina en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19

Introduction: in special situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, university students have been affected by quarantine and temporary suspension of face-to-face teaching activities, consequently, they show signs of anxiety, depression and sleep disorders.Objective: to determine the possible impact on the quality of sleep of the Medicine students of the School of Medical Sciences ́ ́Manuel Fajardo Rivero ́ ́ in the period November 2020 to February 2021. Material and methods: an observational, analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out in the period November 2020 - February 2021. A sample of 37 medical students was selected from a universe of 45. For the processing of the results, the package statistics from Microsoft Excel 2013 and the Shapiro-Wilk test. The statistical software Statistica version 10 was used.Results: there was a predominance of the male sex over the female, the most evident anxiety is presented in the students with sleep disturbances. The psychological affectation predominated for the variables of Pittsburg, Anxiety and Depression and a high self-perception of the medium-low academic performance that is related to alterations in the quality of the same. Conclusions: sleep quality disorders suffered by medical students due to the Covid19 pandemic can manifest in different ways according to sex and age group. Anxiety and psychological disorders predominated as secondary affectation to disorders of the sleep, as well as the self-perception of a medium-low level in academic performance.

Introducción: en situaciones especiales como la actual pandemia de COVID-19 los estudiantes universitarios han sido afectados por la cuarentena y suspensión temporal de actividades docentes presenciales, en consecuencia, muestran signos de ansiedad, depresión y trastornos del sueño.Objetivo: determinar la posible afectación de la calidad del sueño de los estudiantes de Medicina de Facultad de Ciencias Médicas ́ ́Manuel Fajardo Rivero ́ ́ en el periodo noviembre de 2020 a febrero de 2021.Material y Métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico y de corte transversal en el periodo noviembre de 2020 - febrero de 2021. Se seleccionó una muestra de 37 estudiantes de Medicina de un universo de 45. Para el procesamiento de los resultados se utilizó el paquete estadístico de Microsoft Excel 2013 y el test de Shapiro-Wilk. Se utilizó el software estadístico Statistica versión 10. Resultados: existió un predominio del sexo masculino con respecto al femenino, se presenta la ansiedad más evidente en los estudiantes con alteración del sueño. Predominó la afectación psicológica para las variables de Pittsburg, Ansiedad y Depresión y una elevada autopercercepciòn del rendimiento académico medio ­ bajo que se relaciona con alteraciones en la calidad del mismo. Conclusiones: los trastornos en la calidad del sueño sufridos por los estudiantes de medicina a causa de la pandemia por Covid-19 pueden manifestarse de manera diversa según sexo y grupo de edad. La ansiedad y los trastornos psicológicos predominaron como afectación secundaria a los trastornos del sueño, así como la autopercepción de un nivel medio - bajo en el rendimiento académico.

Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil?

The field of neuroscience has seen significant growth and interest in recent decades. While neuroscience knowledge can benefit laypeople as well as professionals in many different areas, it may be particularly relevant for educators. With the right information, educators can apply neuroscience-based teaching strategies as well as protect themselves and their students against pseudoscientific ideas and products based on them. Despite rapidly growing sources of available information and courses, studies show that educators in many countries have poor knowledge of brain science and tend to endorse education-related neuromyths. Poor English skills and fewer resources (personal, institutional and governmental) may be additional limitations in Latin America. In order to better understand the scenario in Latin America's largest country, we created an anonymous online survey which was answered by 1634 individuals working in education from all five regions of Brazil. Respondents stated whether they agreed with each statement and reported their level of confidence for each answer. Significant differences in performance were observed across regions, between educators living in capital cities versus the outskirts, between those teaching in private versus public schools, and among educators teaching different levels (pre-school up to college/university). We also observed high endorsement of some key neuromyths, even among groups who performed better overall. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a detailed analysis of the profile of a large group of educators in Brazil. We discuss our findings in terms of efforts to better understand regional and global limitations and develop methods of addressing these most efficiently.

Managing neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis - Controlled study on a standardized metacognitive intervention (MaTiMS).

OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system of potential autoimmune origin that is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive deficits, as well as with fatigue, stress and psychosocial burden. In the present controlled multi-centre trial we investigated whether two specific neuropsychological interventions (1. metacognitive training (MaTiMS); 2. computerized working memory training (BrainStim) in combination with MaTiMS) applied as add-on therapies to real life standard rehabilitation lead to increased benefit in self-perceived cognitive deficits (the primary outcome) in MS patients compared to standard rehab. METHODS: 288 adult persons in three German rehab centers with a confirmed diagnosis of MS were sequentially allocated to one of the three intervention groups. 249 (87%) participants completed the post assessment and 187 (63%) the online survey after 12 months. Perceived cognitive deficits, mood, fatigue, coping, and activity were evaluated by self-reports and neuropsychological tests at baseline and 4 weeks postintervention. All self-reports were additionally administered digitally at three, six, and twelve months from baseline. RESULTS: We could not show differential effects on the primary outcome between the intervention groups and the control group (p=.369, p=.934). Immediately after each intervention we could show beneficial time effects in all three groups on self-perceived cognitive deficits as well as on most of the other outcomes. The reported effects were however not sustained at 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings could not show an additional effect of specific cognitive training on cognitive deficit perception in MS. However, findings indicate that MS rehabilitation may improve patient reported outcomes in the short term. They also underline the need for concepts to maintain rehabilitation gains when patients return back home.

Cooperative work and neuroeducation in mathematics education of future teachers: A good combination?

In order to respond to the new approaches in higher education, this paper presents the didactic experience of the implementation of a methodological approach based on cooperative learning and the literature review on neuroeducation in 53 students enrolled in the 3rd year of the degree in Early Childhood Education in the subject of Development of Logical-Mathematical Thinking and its Didactics II. The application of cooperative learning in combination with the literature review on neuroeducation aimed to teach future teachers how they should act with their future pupils (aged 3 to 6 years) with special educational support needs (SEN) at school. The design of the proposal to be used was also adjusted to the didactic resources available. The represented contents worked on were magnitudes, time, length, weight, and geometry. The data collected were the activities of the teacher training students (didactic proposals) adapted to the early childhood development stage. They were to be created, so that the main objective was that the undergraduate students would be able to solve the exercises as children would. The students were even challenged to make an exhibition in which they had to act as teachers and their classmates would be the children with SEN. The proposals were evaluated according to a rubric, with an emphasis on the students' teachers' awareness of students with SEN. To conclude, the degree of satisfaction of the student teachers with this methodology was high. This shows that learning neuroeducation and cooperative work makes future teachers know how to teach mathematics also to students with SEN.

Neurobiological reduction: From cellular explanations of behavior to interventions.

Scientific reductionism, the view that higher level functions can be explained by properties at some lower-level or levels, has been an assumption of nervous system analyses since the acceptance of the neuron doctrine in the late 19th century, and became a dominant experimental approach with the development of intracellular recording techniques in the mid-20th century. Subsequent refinements of electrophysiological approaches and the continual development of molecular and genetic techniques have promoted a focus on molecular and cellular mechanisms in experimental analyses and explanations of sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Reductionist assumptions have also influenced our views of the etiology and treatment of psychopathologies, and have more recently led to claims that we can, or even should, pharmacologically enhance the normal brain. Reductionism remains an area of active debate in the philosophy of science. In neuroscience and psychology, the debate typically focuses on the mind-brain question and the mechanisms of cognition, and how or if they can be explained in neurobiological terms. However, these debates are affected by the complexity of the phenomena being considered and the difficulty of obtaining the necessary neurobiological detail. We can instead ask whether features identified in neurobiological analyses of simpler aspects in simpler nervous systems support current molecular and cellular approaches to explaining systems or behaviors. While my view is that they do not, this does not invite the opposing view prevalent in dichotomous thinking that molecular and cellular detail is irrelevant and we should focus on computations or representations. We instead need to consider how to address the long-standing dilemma of how a nervous system that ostensibly functions through discrete cell to cell communication can generate population effects across multiple spatial and temporal scales to generate behavior.

Neuroscience in Education: A Bridge Too Far or One That Has Yet to Be Built: Introduction to the "Brain Goes to School".

There have been numerous detractors and supporters relating to attempts to merge the neurosciences and the knowledge base of related contributing disciplines with the field of education. Some have argued that this is a "bridge too far". The predominant view is that the relationship between neuroscience and the classroom has been neither significantly examined, nor applied. What is needed is a specially trained class of professionals whose role it would be to guide the introduction of cognitive neuroscience into educational practice in a sensible and ethical manner. Neuroeducators would play a pivotal role in assessing the quality of evidence purporting to be relevant to education, assessing who is best placed to employ newly developed knowledge, as well as with what safeguards, in addition to investigating how to deal with unexpected consequences of implemented research findings. This special issue of the "The Brain Goes to School" aims to provide support for the development of training programs that truly integrate curriculum design and classroom instruction with the developmental cognitive neurosciences.

Towards an Architecture of a Multi-purpose, User-Extendable Reference Human Brain Atlas.

Human brain atlas development is predominantly research-oriented and the use of atlases in clinical practice is limited. Here I introduce a new definition of a reference human brain atlas that serves education, research and clinical applications, and is extendable by its user. Subsequently, an architecture of a multi-purpose, user-extendable reference human brain atlas is proposed and its implementation discussed. The human brain atlas is defined as a vehicle to gather, present, use, share, and discover knowledge about the human brain with highly organized content, tools enabling a wide range of its applications, massive and heterogeneous knowledge database, and means for content and knowledge growing by its users. The proposed architecture determines major components of the atlas, their mutual relationships, and functional roles. It contains four functional units, core cerebral models, knowledge database, research and clinical data input and conversion, and toolkit (supporting processing, content extension, atlas individualization, navigation, exploration, and display), all united by a user interface. Each unit is described in terms of its function, component modules and sub-modules, data handling, and implementation aspects. This novel architecture supports brain knowledge gathering, presentation, use, sharing, and discovery and is broadly applicable and useful in student- and educator-oriented neuroeducation for knowledge presentation and communication, research for knowledge acquisition, aggregation and discovery, and clinical applications in decision making support for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and prediction. It establishes a backbone for designing and developing new, multi-purpose and user-extendable brain atlas platforms, serving as a potential standard across labs, hospitals, and medical schools.

On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals.

New findings from the neurosciences receive much interest for use in the applied field of education. For the past 15 years, neuroeducation and the application of neuroscience knowledge were seen to have promise, but there is presently some lack of progress. The present paper states that this is due to several factors. Neuromyths are still prevalent, and there is a confusion of tongues between the many neurodisciplines and the domains of behavioral and educational sciences. Second, a focus upon cognitive neuroimaging research has yielded findings that are scientifically relevant, but cannot be used for direct application in the classroom. A third factor pertains to the emphasis which has been on didactics and teaching, whereas the promise of neuroeducation for the teacher may lie more on pedagogical inspiration and support. This article states that the most important knowledge and insights have to do with the notion of brain plasticity; the vision that development is driven by an interaction between a person's biology and the social system. This helps individuals to select and process information, and to adapt to the personal environment. The paper describes how brain maturation and neuropsychological development extend through the important period of adolescence and emergent adulthood. Over this long period, there is a major development of the Executive Functions (EFs) that are essential for both cognitive learning, social behavior and emotional processing and, eventually, personal growth. The paper describes the basic neuroscience knowledge and insights - or "neuroscientific literacy" - that the educational professional should have to understand and appreciate the above-described themes. The authors formulate a proposal for four themes of neuroscience content "that every teacher should know." These four themes are based on the Neuroscience Core Concepts formulated by the Society for Neuroscience. The authors emphasize that integrating neuroscientific knowledge and insights in the field of education should not be a one-way street; attempts directed at improving neuroscientific literacy are a transdisciplinary undertaking. Teacher trainers, experts from the neuroscience fields but also behavioral scientists from applied fields (notable applied neuropsychologists) should all contribute to for the educational innovations needed.